Does cleft lip and palate affect the severity of malocclusion?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 3D anatomical features of unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral (BCLP) complete cleft lip and palate with those of skeletal Class III dentofacial deformities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 92 patients were divided into cleft and noncleft groups. The cleft group comprised 29 patients with UCLP and 17 patients with BCLP. The noncleft group comprised 46 patients with Class III dentofacial deformities. 3D anatomical landmarks were identified and the corresponding measurements were made on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). RESULTS: The differences between the affected and unaffected sides of the patients with UCLP were nonsignificant. The differences between the patients with UCLP and BCLP were nonsignificant except for the SNA angle. Significant differences between the patients with clefts and Class III malocclusion were identified for the SNA, A-N perpendicular, and A-N Pog line, indicating that the maxillae of the patients in the cleft group were more retrognathic and micrognathic. Relative to the noncleft group patients, the cleft group patients had a significantly smaller ramus height. CONCLUSION: The affected and unaffected sides of the patients with UCLP did not exhibit significant differences. The maxillae of the patients with UCLP were significantly more retrognathic than those of the patients with BCLP. The maxillae and mandibles of the patients in the cleft group were more micrognathic and retropositioned relative to those of the noncleft Class III patients. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The maxillary and mandibular findings indicated greater deficiencies in the patients with UCLP or BCLP than in those with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Appropriate surgical design should be administered.

Does Clockwise Rotation of Maxillomandibular Complex Using Surgery-First Approach to Correct Mandibular Prognathism Improve Facial Appearance?

BACKGROUND: Facial aesthetics may be optimized based on a deeper understanding of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to delineate facial soft tissue changes after clockwise rotation (CWR) of the maxillomandibular complex (MMC) to correct mandibular prognathism using the surgery-first approach. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients over 18 years of age with skeletal Class III malocclusion in the craniofacial center. The patients were excluded with previous history of craniofacial syndrome, orthognathic surgery trauma, infection at surgical sites, chin deviation (menton deviation ≥4 mm), 2 or more missing data points after surgery, or without informed consent. This study compared significant facial changes before (T0) and after orthodontic debonding (T1) in the CWR and control groups. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The patients were divided in accordance with maxillary occlusal plane change (OPC) after surgery into CWR (OPC >4°) and control (OPC ≤4°) groups. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was frontal lip curvature (FLC: Right Cheilion-Stomion-Left Cheilion, degree) with or without upper lip curving upward at T1, where upper lip curving upward was considered more favorable. COVARIATES: The covariates included age, sex, and various cephalometric measurements. ANALYSES: The Mann-Whitney U test, paired, and independent t-test were implemented to compare the intragroup and intergroup differences. Statistical significance was indicated by P value <.05. RESULTS: The study comprised 34 patients (21 women) in the control group and 37 (29 women) in the CWR group; their mean ages were 23.64 ± 4.38 and 24.21 ± 3.84 years, respectively (P value = .562). At T1, the CWR group had significant increased FLC (P value = .001), alar width (P value = .034), and lower vermilion height (P value = .018), and decreased lower lip length (P value = .004). The high FLC group had significant decreased upper lip projection (P value = .002) and increased nasolabial angle (P value = .013). The significant relationship between CWR and high FLC was supported by the χ2 test (P value = .018) and multiple logistic regression (P value = .017). CONCLUSION: Greater CWR of the MMC increased FLC and lower vermilion height and reduced lower lip length. High FLC resulting from the CWR of the MMC improved facial appearance by moving the upper lip curve upward.

Does the floor of the maxillary sinus affect tooth movement for premolar extraction space closure?

OBJECTIVE: The study investigated orthodontic tooth movement by comparing various horizontal and angular measures of the teeth having different sinus-root relationship (SRR) of patients undergoing first premolar extraction treatment protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 45 Taiwanese adult patients, classified as the control group (n = 15) and the sinus group (n = 30) according to SRR. The control group had type I SRR (sinus floor above the level connecting the buccal and palatal root apices), whereas the sinus group included patients with type V SRR (the buccal and palatal root displayed apical protrusion into the sinus floor). Morphology was identified using pretreatment orthopantomograms. Lateral cephalometric measurements were conducted before treatment (T1) and at debonding (T2). RESULTS: Post debonding, there were no statistically significant difference in the two groups. However, the incisors in the control group became marginally more upright than those of the sinus group, and the molars demonstrated tipping movement with minimal anchorage loss in the sinus group than in the control group. The total treatment time was not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The study revealed that the sinus-root relationship does not affect the orthodontic tooth movement. However, a more extensive 3-D study with larger sample size is strongly recommended before coming to any conclusion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The lining of the floor of the maxillary sinus does not affect the orthodontic tooth movement.

Does Clockwise Rotation of Maxillomandibular Complex Using Surgery-First Approach to Correct Mandibular Prognathism Affect Surgical Movement and Stability?

PURPOSE: Orthognathic surgery (OGS) using the surgery-first approach (SFA) can decrease treatment time and increase patient satisfaction. Clockwise rotation (CWR) of the maxillomandibular complex to correct mandibular prognathism leads to optimized functional, aesthetic, and stable outcomes. This study examined the combined effect of SFA and CWR of the maxillomandibular complex to correct mandibular prognathism by comparing the surgical movement before (T0) and immediately after OGS (T1) and the stability between T1 and 12 months after OGS (T2). METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent SFA involving Le Fort I osteotomy and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, with or without genioplasty. Based on the occlusal plane (OP) change at T0-T1, the patients were divided into CWR (OP > 4°) and control (C) groups (OP ≤ 4°). The predictor variable was OP change at T0-T1. The primary outcome variable was the stability of pogonion (Pog) at T1-T2. The covariates included demographic factors, cephalometric measurements (anterior facial height, posterior facial height, OP, mandibular plane angle, incisor mandibular plane angle, overjet, and overbite), and 3-dimensional landmark displacement (anterior nasal spine, A-point, upper central incisor, upper first molar, lower central incisor, lower first molar, Pog, gonion, and condylion). An independent t-test was used to compare between these 2 groups when appropriate. The level of significance was set at P < .05. RESULTS: The sample included 28 patients (17 females) in the C group and 36 (24 females) in the CWR group; the mean ages were 23.89 ± 3.35 and 24.08 ± 4.02 years, respectively. For the surgical movement at T0-T1, the CWR group showed an association with vertical movement of the maxilla at posterior nasal spine (P = .005), anterior nasal spine (P < .001), and A-point (P < .001) and horizontal backward movement of the mandible at B-point (P < .001), Pog (P < .001), and gonion (P = .042). At T1-T2, all landmarks remained stable without clinically significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Surgical movement in the CWR group could vertically displace the maxilla and setback mandible more than that in the C group. Postoperative skeletal stability remained the same between the 2 groups at 1 year after OGS.

The morphology of sella turcica in cleft and non-cleft individuals.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyze the morphology and expedient the linear dimensions of Sella Turcica among cleft and non-cleft Indian individuals, and then to determine whether differences exist between different study groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lateral cephalogram of 300 patients (150 cleft and 150 non-cleft), aged 18 to 30 years who reported for various treatments of malocclusions were studied. RESULT: The normal morphology of the sella turcica were seen in 85 of the 150 non-cleft individuals which was highest (56.66%) in the non-cleft group, however in the cleft group it was seen in only 16 of the 150 individuals (10.6%). Sella turcica bridge were seen in 10% of the non-cleft subjects, whereas in the cleft group it was seen in 38% of the individuals. A significant difference was seen in the linear measurements of the sella turcica of cleft and no-cleft individuals. CONCLUSION: The normal morphology of the sella turcica was seen in the majority of the non-cleft individuals. The cleft individuals showed an increased incidence of sella turcica bridging with reduced linear measurements of the sella as compared to the non-cleft individuals.